December 916, 1999
movie shorts
Hound dogs baying, wildflowers bending to the wind, angry white men in shirtsleeves carrying shotguns, a swatch of cloth clinging to a tree branch. The details are a little too familiar. You know youre looking at yet another recreation of the scary Old American South; specifically, youre looking at the set up for a lynching.
This first scene of The Green Mile can make you cringe: The dogs pick up a scent, the men splash through a stream or mud and then the camera, tracking slowly over the ground, discovers the malefactor, centers him in the frame. Hes a black man, wailing, seated before a log, with two little white girls bodies to either side of him, their dresses torn, their tiny heads bloodied to red pulps.
Its an awful moment, by any standard, a mix of history and horror. And then the movie backs off it almost instantly, transporting you to another time and place, a close-up of an old white mans eyes squinting in pain. You soon learn that what follows is this mans story, even though he wasnt a member of that search party. Rather, Paul Edgecomb (played in this framing scene by Dabs Greer) was head of security at a Louisiana prisons death row, where the black man, John Coffey (Michael Clarke Duncan), was incarcerated and electrocuted in 1935. When Paul, now living in a nursing home, agrees to tell a friend what happened, it becomes clear that the film actually has a compelling mystery at its center, and it isnt the nature of the mystical healing powers Coffey suddenly manifests. Rather, the mystery is this: How did the black mans story become the white mans?
The Green Mile (named for the prison stretch leading to the electric chair) doesnt stage the drama quite so directly. As writer-director-producer Frank Darabonts second adaptation of a Stephen King prison novel, it mixes science fiction and melodrama, creating something thats both more spectacular and more sentimental than its relatively subtle predecessor, 1994s The Shawshank Redemption. Where the first movie explored an interracial friendship to get at the complex combustions of prejudice, trust and redemption, the new one lays its lessons out for you. Where the first film was a sleeper hit, The Green Mile comes to theaters primed for the holidays, when viewers are supposedly looking for uplift and respite, equipped with a manifest moral, a well-financed promotional campaign, a six-part behind-the-scenes series in Entertainment Weekly and an Academy Awards-winning movie stars name above the title.
That star is, of course, Tom Hanks. He plays Paul in 1935, the year when he comes to know the prisoner John Coffey, whose initials tell you something about his role in the films ethical and spiritual scheme of things. Pauls a decent guy, married to Jan (the ever-warm Bonnie Hunt) and perpetually struggling quietly with the moral ramifications of his terrible job. He and his team, including a chief assistant nicknamed Brutal (David Morse), strive to make their charges feel human until the end. When John arrives, everyone including fellow inmates Del (Michael Jeter) and Arlen (Graham Greene) is stunned by his enormity (7 feet tall) and his gentle, naive, even slightly retarded manner. If at first they seem a bit cowed by the prospect of handling a man of this size, Paul and Brutal exchange relieved glances when John asks them to leave a light on in the prison at night, because he gets "scared-a the dark."
Its clear at this point that John is one of the films good guys, an innocent caught in a world of violence and injustice. The bad guys are equally conspicuous, being a malicious white inmate called Wild Bill (Sam Rockwell) and a guard named so very ignominiously Percy Wetmore (Doug Hutchison, a.k.a. The X-Files liver-sucker Tooms). Percys a whiny and sadistic snot, and because hes the governors nephew, hes able to act out his malignity and ignorance without much consequence. While Paul and John are plainly linked in their goodness, Percy and Wild Bills outrageousness make it easy to dislike them, to see them as deserving all the supernatural evil that will be visited upon him.
Blatant as this initial moral outline is, the film persists, making Johns miraculous presence increasingly awesome for Paul and his colleagues. While the story alludes vaguely to such literary models as Uncle Toms Cabin and To Kill a Mockingbird (in which the noble black man instructs open-minded white folks by his example), it also seems to present John as a historical anomaly: He seems to come from nowhere and theres not another black character in sight, despite the films setting in rural Louisiana, 1935. Johns ordeals define him: He has no life other than what he means for Paul, a white man consumed by guilt and sadness. John absorbs that guilt, literally, sucking the evil and illness out of anyone or anything he touches. In Pauls case, John sucks out a urinary tract infection, convulses in pain, then releases the pain as a swarm of digitized flies, buzzing and dissolving as they rise to the ceiling (very biblical, very apocalyptic).
For all its attention to Johns victimization and exacting an emotional response from its audience the film takes a surprisingly schizophrenic view of capital punishment. While on one hand, it highlights the cruelty of the electric chair (one prisoner has a terrible time when the procedure goes wrong and his whole body smokes and fries and pops), but on the other, it allows that just punishment can be meted out against obvious miscreants by those with the power and insight to do so.
Because John is so childlike, hes easy to understand as pure, virtuous and nonthreatening, a character with whom his white captors might sympathize. His last wish in the film (not in the novel) is to watch Top Hat. The frame is filled with the image of Ginger Rogers white feather gown and Fred Astaires supreme grace, against a grand white setting as the soundtrack plays Astaire singing, "Heaven, Im in heaven." Cut to Johns broad smile and tear-tracked cheeks: Hes found his peace, in this white, white celluloid world.
Cindy Fuchs interviews Michael Clarke Duncan.

