Comments on: Maybe the NFL is Really, Really Simple This Year http://citypaper.net/blogs/sports/2009/01/12/maybe-the-nfl-is-really-really-simple-this-year/ Just another Blogs.citypaper.net weblog Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:12:57 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: James Beale http://citypaper.net/blogs/sports/2009/01/12/maybe-the-nfl-is-really-really-simple-this-year/comment-page-1/#comment-11035 James Beale Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:09:38 +0000 http://sportscomplex.blogs.citypaper.net/blogs/mu/?p=3106#comment-11035 Fixed. I had been jumping around in checking past years and got must have gotten the rankings mixed up. Fixed.

I had been jumping around in checking past years and got must have gotten the rankings mixed up.

]]> By: tofoomeister http://citypaper.net/blogs/sports/2009/01/12/maybe-the-nfl-is-really-really-simple-this-year/comment-page-1/#comment-11034 tofoomeister Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:04:26 +0000 http://sportscomplex.blogs.citypaper.net/blogs/mu/?p=3106#comment-11034 One quibble: Arizona is 18th in yards against, not 28th. AZ is 28th in points against. If you're going to sort by PA/G, you have to include the Titans at #2, and push Baltimore and Philly down a spot. Either way, I'm going with "huge fluke" considering Atlanta and Carolina were 5th and 6th in the NFC in PA/G, respectively. One quibble: Arizona is 18th in yards against, not 28th. AZ is 28th in points against. If you’re going to sort by PA/G, you have to include the Titans at #2, and push Baltimore and Philly down a spot.

Either way, I’m going with “huge fluke” considering Atlanta and Carolina were 5th and 6th in the NFC in PA/G, respectively.

]]>