<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drink This Immediately: Jim Beam Black</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citypaper.net/blogs/mealticket/2009/01/06/drink-this-immediately-jim-beam-black/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citypaper.net/blogs/mealticket/2009/01/06/drink-this-immediately-jim-beam-black/</link>
	<description>Meal Ticket is a City Paper blog about food, drink and assorted other things that make you go mmm.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:05:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Felicia D'Ambrosio</title>
		<link>http://citypaper.net/blogs/mealticket/2009/01/06/drink-this-immediately-jim-beam-black/comment-page-1/#comment-2946</link>
		<dc:creator>Felicia D'Ambrosio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 02:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mealticket.blogs.citypaper.net/blogs/mu/?p=1531#comment-2946</guid>
		<description>Mike:  You are quite right about the minimum age requirement being 2 years.   Most commercially available bourbons are aged 4 years, and I did not make the distinction.  Thanks for pointing out my mistake.  

As to whiskey being &quot;softer&quot;, I would say it is a perception thing.  I find Jameson, for example, to be very burning and coarse-tasting, while something like Maker&#039;s Mark tastes gentler. The height of the stills in distillation matters as well; lighter alcohols will make it over the top of short stills, while heavier are left behind.   Also, in most cases higher proof spirits have much more &quot;burn&quot;, from the increased volume of pure alcohol.  I don&#039;t subscribe to the notion that alcohol is &quot;tasteless&quot; -- as Ralph Wiggum says, &quot;It tastes like burning!&quot;

Thanks so much for your comment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike:  You are quite right about the minimum age requirement being 2 years.   Most commercially available bourbons are aged 4 years, and I did not make the distinction.  Thanks for pointing out my mistake.  </p>
<p>As to whiskey being &#8220;softer&#8221;, I would say it is a perception thing.  I find Jameson, for example, to be very burning and coarse-tasting, while something like Maker&#8217;s Mark tastes gentler. The height of the stills in distillation matters as well; lighter alcohols will make it over the top of short stills, while heavier are left behind.   Also, in most cases higher proof spirits have much more &#8220;burn&#8221;, from the increased volume of pure alcohol.  I don&#8217;t subscribe to the notion that alcohol is &#8220;tasteless&#8221; &#8212; as Ralph Wiggum says, &#8220;It tastes like burning!&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks so much for your comment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://citypaper.net/blogs/mealticket/2009/01/06/drink-this-immediately-jim-beam-black/comment-page-1/#comment-2940</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mealticket.blogs.citypaper.net/blogs/mu/?p=1531#comment-2940</guid>
		<description>While I agree with most of your comments, I must state that the minimum age for bourbon is 2 years, not 4.  However, if a bourbon is to be aged for less than 4 years it must say so on the bottle, or so I have heard.  

I also find it strange that you find bourbon &quot;softer&quot; than Irish whiskey.  Irish is triple-distilled and often a good portion of it is distilled to a very high proof, meaning that it has more alcohol and less grain flavour, which translates to a cleaner, softer-tasting spirit.  Though bourbon is indeed sweet, it tends to be more robust and in-your-face because it cannot be distilled to more than 160 proof.  

Anyway, I agree that Jim Beam Black is a great value and a nice whiskey overall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with most of your comments, I must state that the minimum age for bourbon is 2 years, not 4.  However, if a bourbon is to be aged for less than 4 years it must say so on the bottle, or so I have heard.  </p>
<p>I also find it strange that you find bourbon &#8220;softer&#8221; than Irish whiskey.  Irish is triple-distilled and often a good portion of it is distilled to a very high proof, meaning that it has more alcohol and less grain flavour, which translates to a cleaner, softer-tasting spirit.  Though bourbon is indeed sweet, it tends to be more robust and in-your-face because it cannot be distilled to more than 160 proof.  </p>
<p>Anyway, I agree that Jim Beam Black is a great value and a nice whiskey overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Schiffman</title>
		<link>http://citypaper.net/blogs/mealticket/2009/01/06/drink-this-immediately-jim-beam-black/comment-page-1/#comment-2260</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Schiffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mealticket.blogs.citypaper.net/blogs/mu/?p=1531#comment-2260</guid>
		<description>Makes a dandy (if not a tad sweet) Manhattan or Allegheny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes a dandy (if not a tad sweet) Manhattan or Allegheny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
