Letter to the CEO
| Marrazzo |
| glenspringfield.com |
Presented here, in its entirety, a letter from "A Group of Dedicated WHYY Employees" to their uber-paid CEO and President William J. Marrazzo. Seems things still aren't all that happy over on Sesame Street (and special thanks to new CP Intern Eileen Talone for transcribing all five typed pages. Atta gal):
September 1, 2007
An open letter to William J. Marrazzo, CEO and President, WHYY
Dear Mr. Marrazzo,
We are a group of WHYY employees with an accumulation of 109 years of service. Many of us have worked for a number of CEOs over the years, but never has someone with your title and responsibilities impacted the company in such an adverse way. You have displayed a serious lack of understanding when it comes to creating an environment that is conducive to a healthy work place.
This letter is to inform you of the growing negative climate created during your ten years as CEO. Your lack of leadership has contributed to an atmosphere of low morale, virtually no teamwork or cooperation between departments, and an overwhelming feeing of distrust between senior management and the rest of the company.
Under your direction, the ability to get things done in a speedy and timely fashion has slowed to a snail’s pace. You and Bruce Flamm, CFO/COO have created a workplace filled with anxiety, trepidation, and despair when it comes to getting any funding or budgets approved. This attitude has negatively affected our company in a variety of ways. You and Mr. Flamm have instilled a culture that never existed prior to your arrival. During your tenure, there has been a common saying among our staff—“That’s just the way it is around here.”
Whether it’s old, outdated equipment, under-funded budgets, or well below average staff wages, one often hears these same defeated remarks. Mr. Mazzarro, if you understood how good companies operate and treat their employees, you would know your actions only create an unhappy workforce. Good leaders respect their employees and challenge them to be leaders themselves. As employees, we should be encourages to bring new ideas to the table, so as to create an inclusive atmosphere. Your approach to running our company is exactly what respected business management books teach readers not to do. It’s no coincidence that most of our staff never has a nice word to say about you, professionally or personally.
While we would prefer to disclose our names, we know that would lead to our dismissal. This has been proven over the years when an employee has challenged you or your policies, so we reluctantly have to remain anonymous.
So you understand the serious nature of our concerns, the following is a list of reasons we feel this letter is necessary.
1) Your annual compensation package is excessive and inappropriate for a CEO of an NPR and PBS member station. This has been written about in the media many times, and it has affected our ability to raise the funds necessary to operate as the 4th largest market station should. Someone with your business background and educational degrees is certainly entitled to a generous salary; however, earning over $500,000.00 per year is highly disproportionate to that of all other member stations. Many of us have been told by family, friends, and people we’ve met on the street, that they stopped giving to WHYY once they learned of your compensation.
Additionally, your salary has substantially drained our operating budget, and grossly affected our ability to serve the public. If it was more in line with similar member station CEOs’, it’s estimated there would be an extra $300,000.00 annually, which could be better appropriated to serve our cause. As recently as a few weeks ago, a column in The Philadelphia Inquirer brought your salary to the public’s attention once again. The day the column appeared in the newspaper, our station received a number of calls from members protesting, and some regretfully choosing to cancel their membership.
For years, our staff was proud to say we were contributing members. But now it’s just the reverse; we choose not to be members, because it helps to fund your excessive salary. Mr. Marrazzo, we all could have chosen to work in the commercial side of broadcasting earning higher salaries. However, we’ve willingly decided to work for less, knowing we are contributing to a god cause, a cause we strongly believe in. As our leader, you should also be willing to make the same sacrifices. It is clear that you do not understand a fundamental idea many of us learned long ago: do the right thing.
Last year, Charity Navigator rated you as the Highest Paid CEO at a Low-Rated Charity in the country. Further, WHYY rated only two stars, which designated us as: “underperforms most charities in its cause.” It’s no coincidence that our ability to reach our fundraising goals has decreased in the last three or four fund drives. The majority of our fundraising comes from our audience and in the last few years they are increasingly choosing not to give. This is negatively affecting our operations as well as our credibility. Further, when we don’t reach our goals, the pledge drives are extended and our radio and TV airwaves are saturated with more pleas to give. However, most members tell us they find this practice to be excessive and annoying, and feel less compelled to donate their money. This only harms the trust and special bond we have always maintained with many households in Pennsylvania, Delaware, and New Jersey.
At the very least, you and the Board of Directors have been unethical in creating such a high salary structure for your position. WHYY is required by our FCC license and the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 to serve our local region with educational, creative, and diverse radio and TV programming. However, our ability to adhere to these requirements has been weakened, due to a shortage of funds in programming and production budgets, unwarranted business decisions and mismanagement of our day-to-day operations.
2) We are still in need of a replacement for our Station Manager/ Vice President vacancy. The position was also downgraded to a new title of Chief Content Officer, limiting us from hiring the most qualified candidate. It’s now four months later, yet we are still without anyone to lead us in the core function of our company—radio and TV production and programming. Additionally, when the vacancy was announced, we never received any communication from you assuring the staff of your intentions to search for another similarly qualified individual. We’ve been wondering since then how you would guide us in seeking another person with the experience, professionalism and creativity that the previous officer retained.
For many years we produced a wealth of local radio and TV programs, but under your direction the amount has diminished considerably. This would not be hard to reverse, since we see many other NPR/PBS member stations around the country turning out a wide variety of locally produced programs. All it would take is a willingness and commitment to stick to our underlying mission. This further demonstrates your lack of leadership in steering WHYY in the right direction, as well as your indifference to producing wide-ranging local radio and TV shows.
3) The special parking spaces created in the rear of our building for only yourself and your executive staff is just plain wrong. This only helps to build another dividing issue between senior management and the rest of us. A true leader would understand this is not the way to establish trust and garner respect from your employees.
Further, you do not allow any visitors, clients, and most importantly our faithful volunteers to park in this rear parking lot. Why should our volunteers have to pay to park, when we have more than enough space available? Why make a group of elderly women volunteers walk a block and a half at 11:00pm, when they could easily exit through our back door and get in to their vehicles quickly and safely? Why make any of our volunteers pay to park when many of them give up to eight hours of their time helping us raise the money needed to operate? They show commitment to WHYY and we should make things as easy as possible for them to assist us in our mission. Surely the Board does not know about this ridiculous policy.
4) During your tenure, the quality of our Human Resources department has become an embarrassment. You have relegated its director to becoming a highly paid security guard, checking the rear parking lot throughout the day to make sure that only the privileged few park in these spaces. Nothing of any substance comes from the leadership of this department other than basic information regarding our limited and expensive benefits, and a monthly wellness letter.
Additionally, this director has no understanding of the importance of keeping employee personnel files secure. Last year the staff learned that an unpaid intern was given the job of reviewing confidential employee records (including social security numbers, addresses and birthdates) so they were up to date. The identities of our staff were put at unnecessary risk in this day of increasing identity theft.
5) Much of our broadcasting equipment (studio cameras, control room, etc.) is old, outdated, and inferior. Valuable time and money are continually wasted repairing one item after another. Additionally, when money has been spent, it was used to purchase an automated system that cost well over $1,000,000.00, only to have it never work the way you promised. Even after one year in operation, this system still is far from producing its intended results. Instead, it has eliminated the necessary technical jobs that keep us on the air without interruption. All too often we hear from members voicing frustration due to their programs being disrupted. Unfortunately, this equipment had no proven track record and it has lowered the quality of engineering that our members have been accustomed to for many years.
Also, under your stewardship many staff computers failed to be updated with newer technology. Some are still using software and processors that are ten years old, resulting in our productivity being limited and constrained.
6) A couple of years ago each employee completed a detailed questionnaire regarding a variety of issues. We were asked for feedback to improve how the company operated, as well as our overall impressions on how to make WHYY a more enjoyable place to work. After the data was compiled, you then held focus groups to talk about the results. While all of this was a good idea, that’s where it ended. Very little was done to address our concerns, and during those meetings it was made clear that anyone who had a legitimate criticism was wise not to air it.
7) Lastly, your Chief Marketing Officer is strictly committed to your style of instilling resentment with employees and has alienated many in our company. Through her subtle, yet understood bullying of staff members, a demanding style, and setting unreasonable timelines to complete a task or assignment, this officer has fallen right in line with your damaging way of running this company. Since our Public Information Director left the station, this marketing officer has taken on those responsibilities as well, only to extend her detrimental managerial style further through the company.
Mr. Marrazzo, there are many more examples of your failures as a CEO. However, to keep this letter from being any lengthier, we feel what has been stated is a good representation of some of the big picture issues.
With all this in mind, we feel that the only proper way to have these issues addressed is for you and Bruce Flamm to tender your resignation to the Board of Directors. It’s been clearly demonstrated that neither of you retain the important skills or desire to operate this company in a sensible and constructive manner. Yes, you have taken measures to raise sizable amounts of money from wealthy individuals and corporations, but that is not what will help our company survive in the long term. The Board should be challenging you and asking important questions regarding the issues outlined in this letter, as well as having an awareness of the discontent throughout our staff.
Further, the Board has showed little oversight concerning how to maintain the integrity of the bond with our audience. The core of our fundraising comes from our listeners and viewers, and they are making it clear that they don’t want to give like they have in the past. We as employees of one of the finest public broadcasting stations in the country feel WHYY is long overdue for a change in leadership. Mr. Marrazzo, we ask that you and Mr. Flamm do the right thing and end your association with WHYY.
To the Board of Directors and our new incoming Chairman, Gerard Sweeney, we ask that on the 50th Anniversary of our organization, you act promptly to facilitate the necessary changes needed to rebuild the relationship WHYY once had with its audience and employees. You are the ultimate decision makers as to who leads this company’s day-to-day operations. During this process, we know you will consider someone who has the business acumen to run our company, but we ask that you also select someone who values and respects their employees, and understands how to motivate a workforce with an encouraging and inspirational style.
Additionally, we request that you reevaluate the makeup of the Board of Directors. This is a good opportunity to possibly redefine WHYY’s board so that it can be more inclusive and diverse within our entire community. Please also consider designating two members of our staff to attend board meetings and serve as liaisons to our workforce as a whole. This will help rebuild trust and create more transparency.
If you doubt our statements outlines in this letter, we suggest you confidentially poll each member of our staff. You’ll assuredly discover a significant percentage of employees agree with the statements in this letter. We encourage you to end this chapter of our history so we can once again be a great place to work, and garner the respect of our members and audience at large. This way we will be better prepared to serve the Delaware Valley region with vigor and integrity for the next fifty years.
Respectfully yours,
A group of dedicated WHYY employees
Cc: Gerard Sweeney, Vice Chairman of the Board & Chairman-designate, WHYY, Inc.
Editorial Board, The Philadelphia Inquirer
Editorial Board, The Philadelphia Daily News
Editorial Board, the News Journal













I am also an employee at WHYY. Trust me, more people are happy here then not. Some people are just miserable, and apparently they have too much time on their hands.
Bring on the employee survey!
[...] [via CITY PAPER]Â [...]
Well I guess we should all start writing websites to complain about the senior management of our companies when we are unhappy! In fact, we should do it in such a cowardly fashion that enables us to name names - except our own of course. If you don’t like the way things are , I would suggest following the proper channels - like submitting a complaint to the Board. Sir/Madam, I demand YOUR resignation! Or at least have some guts to handle this in a professional manner. One more piece of advice - give your two weeks notice, then go start some company so you can be the CEO and run things the way you want!
Representing yet another long term employee of WHYY, I most express my disappointment with the content of this self serving expression of personal frustration. The group of current and perhaps former un-happy employees that allegedly composed the letter you have published do not, in any way represent the majority. WHYY and the its employees are very proud of the many services it provides and the contribution it continues to make to strengthen our community. It’s a public resource that none of us can afford to loose.
Wah, I don’t get paid enoungh! Wah, I don’t have a parking space! Wah, I don’t like my boss…
Do your job and maybe the station will get more members, and you (I suspect Union members) will get more hours/more local productions. Cry babies.
This ‘dedicated’ group of employees is a weak batch of individuals. You employees say that your CEO and COOs’ practices “negatively affect your company.” What do you think you are doing submitting letters like this to the media? Do you think that is HELPING your company?
If you were truly concerned with this organization you would address your concerns privately with your board and the necessary parties in house but you would not hurt the reputation of your organization.
You say you could work in commerical television but your hearts are in public broadcasting. If that is true then why aren’t you telling your ‘family and friends that have stopped giving due to the CEO’s salary’ why WHYY is a good place to donate and what WHYY needs funding for?
IF you don’t believe in the cause and you are not happy then LEAVE. I am sure there are TONS of other people who can do YOUR jobs- in this market- without COMPLAINING!!!
Do you think people in the commercial industry are running to work because they just love it? You think you are the only ones who aren’t sure they want to go to work everyday?
Do you think you will find a perfect job where you get everything you want and the CEO makes the same or less than you? GET REAL! The CEO earns a salary to run a company.
My advice to you is to GROW UP and GET REAL. There is NO perfect job. Maybe you should play the lottery. Otherwise, leave if you are so miserable but remember that the grass is always greener until you get to the other side!
Isn’t it strange that both people who claim to be WHYY employees are unable to write a grammatically correct sentence? Don’t they work in communications? That makes me more un-happy then anything else!!
Why did that BS comment about grammer get past the site moderator even though I posted my comment before them?
Seems that the same person with bad grammar(probably an overpaid WHYY exec) has been posting on several Philly blogs defending their CEO. Has the top brass done anything besides defend their captain since Karen Heller broke this mess wide open?
After working at WHYY for several years, I have a pretty good idea who was involved with this letter. The “administrative” and the “creative/technical” areas of WHYY never understood each other. One side is running the non-profit as a business, and the other side is only concerned with their professional careers. The creative staff feel they are the heart of the company and should have higher salaries and more recognition. They don’t think the organization is a “business” and have resented Mr. Marrazzo since he was hired. As for the technical staff, they are in a powerful union and don’t know how well off they really are. Why doesn’t someone reveal their salaries and benefits?
There is some truth in the letter but mostly it’s sour grapes and wasted effort.
I work on the administrative side at WHYY. The X-HYYer and other supporters of Bill clearly don’t understand the level of mistrust and low morale at the station. While I’m not sure a public letter was the way to address the issues mentioned, it really hit the nail on the head with the sentiments of many of our staff. I have worked here for more than 20 years, and I have never experienced a more resentful staff of it’s upper management. The backers of Bill fail to address the issues mentioned in the letter. They talk passed everything discussed and are probably senior management doing damage control. At this point, with nothing else working, I understand the frustrations of the group who wrote the letter and their reason for releasing it to the public.
From my point of view, the content of the letter is very accurate. It doesn’t state that Bill should be paid unreasonably, just more in line w/ other PBS/NPR affiliates. The ability of our company to serve it’s primary goal has been seriously impacted by Bill’s compensation. Administrative, creative, and technical staff do not expect to make the same as a CEO or other senior management, but as a non-profit company with a mission to serve the public, it is very excessive. I totally agree that the board of directors has been irresponsible in it’s decision making. Our employees realize that WHYY is a business, but we also have a responsibility that most others don’t have to adhere to.
Regarding the union, I know first hand that they are aware they earn more than non-union staff…we’ve told them that. It is the non-union staff that are the real underpaid employees…actually extremely underpaid.
While the letter was very hard hitting, it really detailed many of the issues that we talk about with each other on a regular basis.
We are a group of employees who wish to state the truth about WHYY. This five-page letter must come from a small number of individuals, and we are writing to tell you that the majority of us at WHYY do not share those expressed sentiments. We, the majority of WHYY employees, do not suffer from low morale. On the contrary, we are bullish about WHYY, and completely support the leadership of our President, and his Executive staff. We wonder how many other media entities enjoy the benefit of a leader who is able to integrate political astuteness, for-profit managerial acumen, and engineering skills. We face many challenges as a public media resource, working alongside competitive commercial markets. Having the benefit of our President’s experience has provided enormous benefits to WHYY, and we as employees have enjoyed the satisfaction of many successes.
We believe that WHYY is on the correct course, and most importantly, we completely support each and every strategic change necessary for WHYY’s future.
Sincerely,
WHYY Employees (Veteran 10 years or more, and less than 10 years)
We are a group of employees who wish to state the truth about WHYY. This five-page letter must come from a small number of individuals, and we are writing you that the majority of us at WHYY do not share those expressed sentiments. We, the majority of WHYY employees, do not suffer from low morale. On the contrary, we are bullish about WHYY, and completely support the leadership of our President, and his Executive staff. We wonder how many other media entities enjoy the benefit of a leader who is able to integrate political astuteness, for-profit managerial acument, and engineering skills. We face many challenges as a public media resource, working alongside competitive commercial markets. Having the benefit of our President’s experience has provided enormous benefits to WHYY, and we are employees have enjoyed the satisfaction of many successes.
We believe that WHYY is on the correct course, and most importantly, we completely support each and every strategic change necessary for WHYY’s future.
Sincerely,
WHYY Employees (Veteran 10 years or more, and less than 10 years)
We are a group of employees who wish to state the truth about WHYY. This five-page letter must come from a small number of individuals, and we are writing to tell you that the majority of us at WHYY do not share those expressed sentiments. We, the majority of WHYY employees, do not suffer from low morale. On the contrary, we are bullish about WHYY, and completely support the leadership of our President, and his Executive staff. We wonder how many other media entities enjoy the benefit of a leader who is able to integrate political astuteness, for-profit managerial acumen, and engineering skills. We face many challenges as a public media resource, working alongside competitive commercial markets. Having the benefit of our President’s experience has provided enormous benefits to WHYY, and we as employees have enjoyed the satisfaction of many successes.
We believe that WHYY is on the correct course, and most importantly, we completely support each and every strategic change necessary for WHYY’s future.
Sincerely,
WHYY Employees (Veteran 10 years or more, and less than 10 years)
Regardless of whether you agree with this tactic or not, it’s very difficult to defend a non-profit CEO’s salary of $500,000. I donate to my local PBS & NPR stations, but would not if their CEOs were being paid that much. Once that amount is made public, the damage is done, and is probably irreparable.
Just found this, and it sounds like there are pissed off people at whyy, too bad. After reading these comments and that long letter, it sounds so divided there. I don’t see or hear it when I listne and watch my favorite programs but I suppose that’s kinda at workplaces everywhere, like any family with angst but dinner has to be put on the table every night. This makes me think harder about supporting whyy.
Oh, and to posters “WHYY Employees respond,” you guys make your CEO sound like a God who doesn’t make mistakes, I think you are an elite (read boss. Who would use the word “bullish” in a post like this?). But that “upstairs HYYer” also sounds like a boss, who else would know what union workers are making, comes across as disgruntled but doesn’t speak for the the “majority” of the staff, so I’m more inclined to believe this is more genuine it makes your CEO sound like a person who makes mistakes, just like the rest of us humans.
Makes me think that the station employees are definitely in two camps and that’s just at the boss level, probably not a good thing. I wonder what the working staff are thinking.
I gotta say what was always on “The X-Files” when that was on the air, “The Truth is out there.” Yeah, there are no absolutes. I think that there is a piece of the truth in all these posts and a serious problem when people are willing to send an anonymous letter that started this, an angry one at that.
I hope this doesn’t affect the clear and decent stuff on the radio, Hey Marty could you do a show on this? I guess you’d have to recuse yourself if you are in one of those two camps. maybe you can get a guest host on that day. Thanks for doing your show everyday, I listen when I can. Hey, was Michael Palin in your studio the other day or was he somewhere else? Great show.
WHYY, get some therapy and heal.
Mr. Speaker, point of order! Can these posters claim to speak for the majority? Point of order!
In the Blogosphere, speak for yourself, don’t make generalities. Embellish, embellish, embellish.
I like Terry Gross and her show is great, don’t let this dispute affect the show.
Wow. This letter rings so true. I pulled my membership and have warned several major donors to steer clear of WQED as a result of its overpaid, self-serving CEO. Over the years, I have had several friends work at this station and the details are very consistent with what I have heard. I hope the Board takes this letter very seriously and we see a much needed change in management.
Hey!
Look at this, it’s an echo from the past. Long ago, in a city far, far away a group of employees got together and signed a statement to be read to a Board of Directors at a Public Television station. Ha, ha, ha, what is original about any of this, this. Burp…..
http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=kcts25&date=20030425
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/special/fbi_probes/20070522_Ex-seaport_museum_chief_charged.html
I’m sure if John Carter knew what was going on, he’d send his regards….when’s he gonna get sentenced anyway??
So, isn’t there a lesson to be learned from these two historical models? Or do I have to go back to Charles Dickens and spank you with a “Christmas Carol?” eouuwwhhh…..
Board, get a bigger room for your next meeting and talk to ‘dat board in Seattle to get tips on how to handle this.
CEO, set up a MySpace page to explain yourself to the world, you’d better use that ’spensive brain and fix this. Oh and you’d better check that you didn’t get any Christmas Cards from John Carter, be careful where you burn them.
Employees, get your act together and sign your damn letter. It’d better have more than 5 names, I think at least 6 should do it.
Oh, and don’t these things take time to play out? Who really cares about this crap anyway? Well, it is fascinating and captivating to see silly people try to outpost each other….hee hee. And somebody has got to apologize for the WHYY beg-athon!! not another one…
Janet, dearest….it was your idea!
I completely understand the sentiments in this letter; most of them ring true for WLVT in Bethlehem as well. The high staff turnover speaks for itself; before Pat Simon there were many employees who had 20+ years of service. Where’d they go? Ask Pat Simon. People see Pat Simon for what she is and they leave (or are pushed out). Her decisions are based on what is best for Pat Simon, not what is best for WLVT. It’s a shame that these people, like Pat Simon, are taking a very noble and worthwhile cause like PBS and butchering it in their overpaid, overpowered greed. For the record, the “proper channels†that were mentioned have been tried - the Board doesn’t want to get involved! So the current employees are trapped, affected by the cancer Pat Simon created until they break free. PBS is a public company; therefore, the public deserves to know the truth.
I think one point is being missed here. A public broadcasting station, non-profit at that, is paying its CEO over a half million dollars during a time of layoffs, reduced programming, reduced overhead and high employee turnover.
Them’s the facts, not an embellishment.
If you have your ear to the ground in Philly, this letter doesn’t surprise.
Hell, it shouldn’t surprise anyone living in America. When the White House has a profit-driven CEO with a distaste for cultural progress hell-bent on dividing the rank and file, what do you think you’ll get in corporate America? A bunch of suits who see the same approach can be taken with employees.
The tide will turn. Will we like the next boss?
This is just another example of people not talking to each other. There is a public trust that needs to be maintained here, and with changes and pressures, the minor issues get focused on.
Didn’t Bill Marrazzo leave as CEO of Weston during a period just before the bullish market indicators start taking off into the stratosphere? Why did he leave a company poised for great growth just before the biggest boom to hit the market?
What kind of leadership did he display there? What were his accomplishments that qualified him for the whyy helm? How come his business acumen pointed him to whyy just before the biggest boom in recent times? Or was that his political astuteness tingling like a “Spidey Sense” (what kind of tingling would that be?)? Any Weston people want to chime in? We could all use some more background about this.
Oh, and I just saw on the “net” that the founder of Weston, Roy F. Weston passed away recently, condolences to all.
http://news.aol.com/story/_a/weston-founder-and-sustainability/n20070821072409990011
Meanwhile……
http://www.phillymag.com/articles/philadelphia_magazine_contrarian_dialing_for_dollars/
Not, wlvt too…….is it the culture of America, the powerful and politically connected rule. Is this compassionate fiefdom in action?
I recently moved from a job at a company in Philadelphia which suffered a similar CEO issue. I left because I had finished my degree and it was time to find a new job. The employees are incredibly unhappy with the leadership and the morale is dropping further than I could have imagined.
Any time employees had a negative opinion about one of the CEO’s projects, they were ignored - this occurred on all levels from simple things affecting a few people to large things that affected the majority of employees. The board of directors is snowed and no one will say anything. People at all levels are leaving and it is sad to see this place being driven into the ground by the ego of one person.
I have no idea what it is like at WHYY, but if it is like it was at my former job, I congratulate the writers of this letter. It took balls to write the letter and make it public. Maybe writing it and not signing it was weak, but I understand that the individuals feared for their jobs.
Some history on Weston found on the net. I found some stuff on my own.
http://www.answers.com/topic/roy-f-weston-inc?cat=biz-fin
Interesting reading.
See this, 3/4’s down, didn’t expect to find it.
http://www.secinfo.com/dr89b.811j.d.htm
It seems that a new Board of Directors would need to be installed at WHYY before Mr. Marazzo would consider resigning. Oh, and a change in strategic direction accompanied by an educated and expert collection of Community Leaders well versed in this changing technological landscape.
Are the people on the Board smart, savvy and in tune with today’s culture? Or are they just local rich people who “bought” seats on the board for their own personal agendas? Do they ride SEPTA? Every day? And find themselves short of cash and patience with the system now and then? Wait, they write the rules that govern the system, that entitles them to the perquisites of the “Board Life.”
Mr. Marrazzo isn’t the real issue (big picture, societal, soul of America kind of stuff), it’s the Board’s accountability to the public that ought to be the issue and it isn’t just this nonprofit, it’s lots of non-profits who just don’t have the same kind of profile nor the eagle-eyed shareholders watching over wealth investments. I mean Karen Heller’s column didn’t even start with whyy, it was that other group that Senator Arlen Spector questioned (I don’t even remember that group’s name without referring back to Karen Heller’s column).
I’ll bet that guy is happy all this is happening here and that he’s yesterday’s news. Hey has whyy even gone and done a story on National Night out?
But no non-profit is ever going to implode as Enron did, rippling through large segments of the economy and bring this news to the public who sorely need to know whyy. This kind of revolution has to start and end with the public, not a bunch of employees. But they can sure as heck start on big, big spark.
Haven’t there been United Way and Red Cross scandals years ago? What happened, did anyone resign?
-to quote Philly Mag:
“And then there’s Bill Marrazzo at WHYY, the hands-down local winner of the brass-cojones-bleed-the-donors-dry award. Making $420,000 plus a staggering $86,000 in benefits, Marrazzo is the most highly paid local public television station chief in the nation. He is paid far more than the heads of New York’s WNET and Boston’s WGBH, who each manage budgets nearly six times the size of WHYY’s. Both ‘NET and ‘GBH are truly great public television stations, with large production staffs and national reputations for excellence.”
WHYY, I looked for your list of board members and couldn’t find it on your website, who are your board members? The public wants to know.
More stuff on the net.
http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=William+Marrazzo,+$443031+forbes&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
3/4’s down the page at forbes. Not sure how long this will be up.
Hey, I just read a new article from Philly Mag here http://www.phillymag.com/articles/dead_air/ Man! How did Steve Volk get the kind of access to be able to write his “profile” without getting shown the door at WHYY? He got to hang out at Marrazzo’s house, office and accompany him to a party to welcome another executive to Philadelphia? No body gave me a party when I moved here to take a job!? frown….When is that board going to realize that this kind of coverage pinches the flow of grassroots financial support, just enough to hurt. Heck, they are always piping up about how over 50% of the money comes from the public. Does Steve Volk practice the, “Force” and pull an “obi Wan” … “you will tell me about your job, and allow me to follow you around and interview your staff and ask for stories about you…” May the Force be with you.
So, a Charity Observer blog has picked up on this and the Karen Heller piece. http://www.wheremostneeded.org/2007/10/philadelphians-.html
I guess this story will slowly fizzle out and nothing will change.
[...] to sink my teeth into, personally. At least go through the guy’s trash or something. Related: A Sept. 2007 letter from WHYY employees to Marrazzo Tags: philadelphia inquirer, whyy, william j. [...]