I Was a Clinton Volunteer

Published: Apr 16, 2008

Also see our story on Mike Newall's time as an Obama volunteer.

*Editors' Note: The decision to do these stories with undercover reporters using pseudonyms was made because we feel this is an important story, one the public needs to hear. It's also one that would have been exceedingly difficult to tell using traditional methods. It is the story of two campaigns in a make-or-break primary where messages are tightly controlled. All asterisked names have been changed to protect the privacy of people who did not know they were being reported on. For more on this, please see the Editor's Letter.

My first task as a Hillary Clinton volunteer was to get past the campaign's dead-bolted front door. I began with a hearty knock, the kind you hear when a political canvasser is on your stoop. No answer. I dropped to two knees and peered into the space between the door and the thin rug. No lights. I put my ear to the door, and dialed the general number. Ring. Ring. Ring. "Hi, you've reached the Philadelphia office of Pennsylvanians for Hillary, our office is located at five two zero, North Delaware Avenue. ... "

ADVERTISEMENT

At 9:20 a.m., I'd been at it for 25 minutes, walking the halls, making sure the door with the blue Hillary Clinton for President sign was actually the Hillary Clinton for President office. It was.

I sat on the floor and waited, hoping to fulfill what seemed like political responsibility, but what was also, I confess, journalistic curiosity: It was the first day of my assignment going undercover as a campaign volunteer.

When my editors put me up to this, I wanted to tackle some big questions: Would we Philadelphians truly be the "deciders" of a presidential primary? How does national politics operate on a local level? And who are these legendary Clintons, who draw both fanatical love and hate? I wanted to know these things in a truthful way, not through the spin of some campaign flack. But by 9:30 a.m., just a week after this office opened, my desire for knowing became much simpler: Where the hell were these people?

Ten minutes later, Marc*, a recent college grad and paid field organizer, showed up and took a seat across from me on the floor. "Maybe they're in a meeting in the back?" he said. Seven other staffers eventually trickled in. "The mayor's office would like a memo, detailing all of the appearances we'd like Mayor Nutter to do," a young guy in a gray blazer said into a cell phone. "You know, like what black radio stations to go on, what neighborhoods to appear in. Like two pages, OK?" We all stood in a circle around the door, staring at it. No one asked who I was. Someone eventually showed up with a key. "We gave out 20 of them yesterday," he said to no one in particular. "Where'd they all go?"

Once inside, I was asked to sign a volunteer log. My editor and I had done a random Google search for an Italian surname and came up with Vinci. Tom Vinci. I was handed a contribution form (donation: $0), and a piece of paper that asked if I would pledge to vote for Hillary Clinton (no).

I had no guilt about not pledging. I was about to give Hillary Clinton my time — and that was valuable enough. Even though Clinton's projected to win Pennsylvania, this city is not her turf: Polls suggest that Obama will remain competitive in the state because of Philadelphia. It was obvious that part of Clinton's strategy should be to draw away as many local votes as possible.

By the time my experiment ended, I volunteered 29 total hours between March 13 and April 3, a three-week span crucial for recruiting volunteers and defining the campaign's message in the city. It wasn't glamorous: Those hours were spent phone banking, making lawn signs and preparing venues for Chelsea Clinton's visibility events. Tom Vinci may not be real, but the votes he culled for the candidate are.

A campaign staffer took the forms. "Have a seat," she said. "What's your threshold of grunt work today?"

"Whatever," I said. "Bring it on."

She vanished into a room and came back with a black Nextel cell phone. I was to write down messages that came in the night before to the answering service.

The first was a hang-up. The second was someone who wanted to know if there was a field office in Pittsburgh. (Not yet.) The third was a hang-up. This was easy.

Things picked up by the eighth message. Just hours before, former U.S. Representative and Clinton fundraiser Geraldine Ferraro quit the campaign after she said, "If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position." An older man with a craggy voice wanted to tell someone that he found her departure preposterous. The answering machine listened.

"Obama's people bullied us at the caucus here," he said about an unspecified state. "People were scared, crying here, because Obama's people were taking over. ... What [Ferraro] said was nothing, they make everything racist." Click.

The 16th came from a woman obviously calling from downstairs. She was trying to get into the building the night before for the first Philly 4 Hillary meeting, but the door was locked. "Um, yes, we're downstairs, trying to get in to the meeting tonight," she said, calmly. "Can someone come in to open the door? Thank you."

Next was a call from a woman who heard a radio host call Clinton a whore on-air. "I just wanted you to know that," she said, sounding stunned. Next, a call from someone who said she was a "big donor" and couldn't get anyone to answer the phone in Philadelphia.

No. 19 was the locked-out woman again, sounding a bit more desperate: "Hello? We're still downstairs. Can someone come open the door? Hello? We're here for the meeting." Click.

A few more hang-ups. More Ferraro ranting. Another person called to propose a great "photo-op": Hillary Clinton paying a visit to the caller's hometown in ... Clinton County. "It'd be great!" she says.

And finally, the 23rd call:

"Hello? We're standing outside. Is someone there? Is the meeting here? Hellooo? Helloooooooooo?"

The modern-day Hillary Clinton campaign was born in the 1990s, a product of several events that began just before her husband won the presidency. These were years of harsh scrutiny for Hillary: first at the hands of Republicans during the election, then from Congress during her health-care reform push, then from the media during the Lewinsky scandal, and then from two salacious biographers.

ADVERTISEMENT

Around the same time, MSNBC and Fox News began to change the way politicians delivered their message to voters. These big, detached cable stations replaced the ground-up, ultra-local style that was dominant in the decades before. Who the local ward leader supported or newspaper endorsed gave way to what the campaign manager said on CNN that afternoon.

Bill Clinton captured this idea perfectly in 1993. In their 2006 book The Way to Win, ABC News political director Mark Halperin and The Politico editor John F. Harris wrote that the president "teased reporters" soon after shutting down walk-in access to the press secretary's office: "You know why I can stiff you on the press conferences?" he quipped. "Because Larry King liberated me by giving me to the American people directly."

This strategy helped Bill win the White House, and has helped Hillary in the years since.

During her races to become a New York senator, Hillary embraced the focused, tight messages that cable stations allowed her to broadcast. She and her influential consultants managed the public's perception of her from the campaigns' highest levels, ensuring that the candidate remained likeable, and more importantly, electable, to everyday Joes like you and me. The tactics were executed in television studios and carefully scripted campaign stops across the country.

This was the opposite of the grassroots, Howard Deaniac-style race, where fervent just-out-of-college staffers and volunteers helped the candidate set the campaign's message and tone. In that same book, Halperin and Harris spent 80 pages vetting Hillary Clinton's chances in the political and media arenas should she run for president. "She would have no difficulty attracting first-rate policy staffers, Iowa [the first election-year caucus] field operatives, or advance men and women. ... She would never have a shortage of volunteers," they wrote. In six chapters, it's the only mention of what role Hillary's field operations would play in the future race. This was no mistake on the author's part: It's just not Hillary's style.

This became evident before I finished my first week at the headquarters. We volunteers were on our own as the staffers struggled to learn the city, get the computers online, and essentially wait for more staffers to show up. No one paid us much mind.

No one paid us mind, that is, until Clinton's supporters circulated an e-mail on Friday afternoon heralding the arrival of Chris Matthews, host of MSNBC's political talk show Hardball. He was coming, the e-mail said, for an "off the record peek at our fast-growing outreach program in Pennsylvania.

"Our volunteer coordinator ... is spending a great deal of time recruiting volunteers to help out in the office on Sunday morning (we are asking folks to arrive 11 a.m.) so we can show Chris Matthews how much grassroots support we have here in Philly. ... It is important that we show Chris Matthews that there are a ton of young people and students supporting Hillary here in Philadelphia."

I drove to the office that Sunday, passing dozens of Obama supporters on Chestnut Street. I met an elderly couple, George* and Peggy*, in the elevator headed to the second floor.

"Are you going to Hillary Clinton's offices?" George asked.

"Yep."

"We heard Chris Matthews is going to be there!" said Peggy.

We walked in together and immediately got hit with the news: Matthews canceled; he wasn't coming. Upset, George and Peggy milled about the front of the room.

The office was packed with nearly 30 volunteers. There was the awkward chatter of mass-phone banking: the sound of a dozen people all repeating the same message — "I'm a local volunteer ... Hillary has spent the past 35 years fighting for American families ... real solutions to tackle the tough issues ... " at different intervals.

People wrote letters to the editor at computer terminals. One woman's missive: "I have traveled extensively around the globe and everyone I met asks, 'What happened to the U.S? We hope Sen. Hillary Clinton becomes the next president.'"

A few feet away, George and Peggy appeared defeated. "I guess that's that," said George. He took his wife's hand, and they left.


(CLICK IMAGE FOR LARGER VERSION)

Two facts: Phone banking is volunteer hell. The Clinton campaign loves phone banking.

ADVERTISEMENT

There was a sign, scrawled in marker on one of the walls, that read: "Make calls all the time." This was not a motto. It was an expectation.

So I wasn't surprised when Jonathan*, a volunteer team leader, gave me a cheery hello and handed me a black Nextel one Tuesday. I sat next to two college freshmen — James* and Kathy*, in town from New York to help the cause — and reviewed that day's pitch to the Republicans and Independent voters. (To make our calls, we dialed into a private service that rings the numbers for us. We just stayed on the line as the calls came in.)

At the end of each call, we pressed "star" and the corresponding number so the computer could tag each response. When one young man yelled "OBAMAAAAA" into the phone, I pressed "star, 4": definitely Obama. When one older woman said, "I wouldn't vote for her in a million years. The Clintons are hussies," I pressed "star, 5": not supporting Hillary or Republican. It was tedious.

I took a break and asked my two scarf-clad, bug-eye-sunglassed friends how their day was going.

"I just got one woman," said Kathy, looking aghast, "who called Hillary a bitch."

Kathy is a literature major in New York, and she actually drove to Philly for a party later that night. She fits into one of three dominant demographics of Hillary supporters I met: 1) the young college female, generally not from Philadelphia; 2) the middle-age to elderly woman, very likely a local; and 3) the awkward middle-aged man. Kathy stood out, though, because she was able to offer what seemed like a very powerful reason for supporting a candidate that "95 percent" of her college friends do not:

"I volunteered for Deval Patrick" — the Massachusetts governor who ran a reform-oriented campaign during the 2006 election — "because his message was amazing: how he was going to change the way things worked and all. It's one and a half years later and I don't see him doing anything. I don't see the reforms he promised.

"We were rabid volunteers," she said. "We went all out for him, the same way Obama's people are now. I just don't buy that mass rhetoric anymore. It's a letdown. Reform is complicated."

The one unifying sentiment among all Hillary volunteers, besides the obvious, is their disdain for Obama supporters, whom they see as both delusional and impossibly peppy. Clintonites don't hate them per se, they just think they're not smart enough to think on their own.

There's also an undercurrent of envy. Obama supporters were everywhere in Philadelphia, and in March and the first days of April, we were not. Tales came in from friends of friends: Obama's people get to organize their own rallies; they have local offices all over the city. This, of course, is the character of their campaign, and is the opposite of Clinton's 1990s-style campaign setup.

It was frustrating, and soon led to a semi-revolt at a Wednesday night Philly 4 Hillary meeting. A hodgepodge group arrived to talk about voter registration — the primary registration deadline was five days away — and meet a paid organizer.

The staffer talked about the importance of signing people up to vote. The volunteers said they'd heard enough of this, and wanted to actually do so.

"The other candidate's people are knocking at my door," said an older South Philadelphia woman who eventually just set up her own voter registration effort outside her local ShopRite. "When do we do that?"

We got our chance several days later. This is when I realized that most Hillary supporters I've actually met in this city have two main motivating factors: They're either supposed to support Hillary, or they're horrified of the alternative.

The former is easy to spot, and usually comes in the form of union support. In early April, Hillary made a speech at the Center City Sheraton to the AFL-CIO. About 75 people packed three corners at 17th and Race streets, and went ballistic when Hillary's motorcade arrived. Secret Service officers popped out of her SUV (including the hatchback) and led her to one of the corners for a quick handshake and smile before she was whisked into hotel's back door.

It was high-energy, and the staff tried to keep it going by asking us to rally on a nearby corner. Two Laborers slapped hands and hugged. "That's a day's work," they said to each other, and left, along with almost every other member. About 12 people, many of them staffers, remained.

The others, those who are motivated by fear, are harder to come across. On one of the first big weekends of canvassing, I asked to go into West Philly. "We avoid places," a staffer said, "where there are security concerns."

I was instead assigned to a team in the Northeast's Lawndale section, just a few blocks away from J.C. Melrose Country Club. It's a peaceful Latino and white community of working-class to upper-working-class people. There was no convincing to do, because everyone was already voting for "us." Josephine*, an older woman, and Mike*, a thirtysomething, spent most of the afternoon handing Hillary fliers to people who bought Clinton's cable-news campaign wholesale.

Of the 57 houses we scoured, the highlight was Vincent*, a Hellerman Street resident. "I'm not too sure of this, what's his name, Hussein Osama ... Obama," he said with a straight face, showing no indication he'd just confused a Saudi-born terrorist with a Hawaiian-born politician. "There's no way I'll vote for him. I think he's a poser."

Otherwise, one other person timidly said she was leaning Obama, but took a Hillary placard anyway. Two teenagers yelled, "Hillary Clinton can give me a blowjob" from their window on Robb Street. Everyone was just eager to get back to their Sunday afternoon.

This gave the three of us plenty of time to talk.

"Look, if you're going to go this far, and you're going to put all this money in, and you're going to get all these people's hopes up, why just quit?" Josephine said after we all admitted that Clinton's chances of getting the nomination are bleak. "If that were me, I'd take it all the way. Until I went down in flames."

Mike agreed. "Now that Bush will be gone soon, the bloggers need a new target," he said. "It's her. She's always been a target."

I tried to deflect the conversation to Obama's fervent volunteers. "You know, I see those kids all over my neighborhood," he said as we walked up the steps to the next house, "and the more I see them, well, I really think they're brainwashed."

The rally at Broad Street and Ridge Avenue was supposed to start at 4 p.m. Forty-five minutes later, I sat on the Divine Lorraine's abandoned steps and called headquarters, asking where everyone was.

ADVERTISEMENT

"They left already," a staffer said over the phone. "They should be there."

There were commuters, homeless men and store owners milling about. I thought I'd have seen someone hopping around with a hand-painted "Honk for Hillary" sign. The only remotely political thing happening was the five or six members of ACORN (the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now), asking people if they wanted to register for the general election.

Finally, at 5 p.m., I spotted a volunteer captain standing on the center island between Ridge and Fairmount avenues. He quickly looked around and returned the way he came, going north on Broad Street.

I followed him a few blocks to Cobre, a Latin-themed restaurant where Chelsea Clinton was scheduled to make an appearance that night. "Sorry," he said when I caught up, "we got held up at the last stop." He asked if I'd like to help. "You can be captain of this section, and we'll go down to Ridge." He gave me a handful of fliers.

That left me with Lara*, a spunky twentysomething who the Obama campaign would love to have in their corner. Everyone who dared pass her got a flier.

"Chelsea's going to be here tonight," she said to a guy on a bike.

"Who?" he asked.

I gradually learned more about why the other volunteers were delayed. "Actually," Lara said, "we were kind of late because we saw all the bombed-out houses and we were scared to park [the volunteer captain's] really nice car near them."

She studied my face. "We were scared." At Broad and Ridge.

This was the same week Hillary Clinton took criticism for her "Tuzla tale," where she told crowds that snipers fired at her after landing on the tarmac during a 1996 trip to Bosnia, when, instead, videos show a small girl reading her a poem. (She said she "misspoke" about the snipers.) There's a metaphor here, somewhere.

Things picked up. About 15 volunteers arrived (a Philadelphia attorney said he came because "my friend is a staffer and he said the camp was having trouble organizing") and rallied rush-hour drivers, eliciting car-horn beeps and cheers. George Perez, a staffer in U.S. Rep. Bob Brady's office and surrogate for the city's Democratic Party, arrived, followed by a car full of men from the painter's union. I helped rig a 4- by 10-foot sign in the restaurant. Chelsea Clinton would be here in 30 minutes.

No one heard when it began, but we soon realized there was a background noise. We stopped to listen: It was a static-riddled voice, like someone was speaking into a megaphone.

... words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage ...

It was coming from the brownstone next to Cobre.

... it is a story that has seared into my genetic makeup ...

On what looked like the fourth floor, someone had attached a small speaker to the building, and pointed it toward us. The voice picked up.

... the press has scoured every exit poll for the latest evidence of racial polarization ...

"Is that God?" asked an older volunteer.

"No," I said, standing near the brownstone, "that's Obama."

Someone was blasting Obama's speech on race, delivered nine days before at the National Constitution Center, on repeat. The brownstone door opened, and out came a guy who looked like a young Clint Eastwood. He had on wraparound sunglasses and a houndstooth fedora. He sat on the stoop, gazed into the distance, and unrolled a dish towel-size flag that read:

FLOC

Hasta la victoria

"Caesar Chavez, siiiiiiiiii," he droned, looking at no one.

FLOC, incidentally, is an acronym for the late Caesar Chavez's Farm Labor Organizing Committee.

"What's going on?" asked one of the staffers. We explained. "My god," she said, "I can't fucking stand Obama people."

This one person's show managed to draw attention away from Chelsea Clinton's event, which took hours to organize. It's simple, grassroots, startup ideas like this that have poked holes in the Clintons' carefully crafted messages. Matt Drudge and his rudimentary Web site became the place to find out all of the salacious details of the Lewinsky scandal. And Barack Obama's hordes of followers are doing it today, spreading the word about their candidate through social networking sites (as of this writing, Obama's Facebook fan page has 769,845 members; Clinton's has 146,306). It's obvious here in Philadelphia: By the time the Clinton campaign's one office was regularly holding rallies and canvassing the city, Obama's campaign was already doing that at nearly a dozen volunteer-heavy, neighborhood-based sites.

A white SUV pulled up, and Chelsea popped out, in jeans and a blazer. She exchanged words with someone near the curb, waved, and walked right in to Cobre to begin speaking. "My mother has been great in that determination and that stubbornness and passion," she said. "It really inspires me. ... " She fielded questions and stayed on point. The crowd swooned.

She never once mentioned the blaring speech, the one that distracted everyone — local party operatives, staffers, volunteers and myself. I wondered if she even heard it.

(tom.namako@citypaper.net)

Comments

OBAMA LIES AGAIN AND MAINSTREAM MEDIA LIKE CNN HIDES IT!
VOTERS ARE SICK OF THE MEDIA EXCUSING OBAMA NO MATTER WHO HE OFFENDS!!!!

Sen. Obama referres to himself as 'a constitutional law professor on the campaign trail. TRUTH: He never held any such title! Obama changed website bio to reflect that he was a 'lecturer' rather than 'professor. Chicago Daily Herald

Obama gets 4 Pinocchio’s for 100 Years War-Wondered why the national media won’t call out Obama for his serial distortions on McCain’s Iraq comments, the Globe tried to help Obama rationalize it. Michael Dobbs scolded Obama in today’s Fact Checker


MSNBC-OBAMA: ANOTHER SUPER, EXAGGERATION
Washington Post caught Obama in a lie about the Kennedy family role.
The WashigntonPost Fact Check- Senator Obama CAUGHT LYING about Kennedy Role in Helping His Father Contrary to Obama's claims in speeches Kennedy family did not provide the funding for a September 1959 airlift of 81 Kenyan students to the United States that included Obama's father. According to historical records and interviews with participants, the Kennedys were approached for support for the program a year later, July 1960. family responded with a $100,000 donation, which went to pay for a second airlift in September 1960.

Judicial Watch:
By Klaus Marre-Obama ‘intended to leave no paper trail’ OBAMA REFUSES to cooperate in releasing 8 years of his state senate records. One main reason REZKO!

Politico reports, “During his first run for elected office, Barack Obama played a greater role than he acknowledges in crafting liberal stands on gun control, the death penalty and abortion– positions that appear at odds with the more moderate image he’s projected during his presidential campaign. The evidence comes from an amended version of an Illinois voter group’s detailed questionnaire, filed under his name during his bid for a state Senate. In response to a Politico story, Obama’s answers he never saw questioaire?

NBC- Aswini Anburajan
OBAMA LIES IN PENNSYLVANIA AD
It's unfortunate that Senator Obama is using false advertising to explain why he can be trusted to do something about energy prices. In his ad, Obama says, I'm Barack Obama, and I don't take money from oil companies or lobbyists, and I won't let them block change any more. Obama has been the recipient of more than $220,000 from the oil and gas industry just since as of Feb/08. Two of Obama's campaign bundlers are also CEOs for oil and gas companies, per his campaign Web site? Obama needs to answer to VOTERS about his dealings with one of his largest contributors Exelon, a big nuclear power company that he cut deals behind closed doors protecting them from full disclosure in the nuclear industry. Exxon, Shell, and others are among his biggest donors

Obamas record shows he infact did support the war when he got to the senate, voted twice against bringing America's troops back home. He voted for war appropriations giving our money to Halliburton and Blackwater where Texas woman, was gang-raped by her co-workers at a Halliburton/KBR camp in Baghdad, His latest bit of posturing S 433 allows the Bush Administration to suspend any troop withdrawal, if not suspended, keeps the troops in Iraq for a long time to come

Obama said he goofed on votes angered fellow Democrats in the Senate when he voted to strip millions of dollars from a child welfare office on Chicago's West Side. But Obama had a ready explanation: He goofed! Also announced he had fumbled an election-reform vote the day before, on a measure that passed 51 to 6. The next day, he acknowledged voting "present" on a key telecommunications vote. He stood on March 11, 1999, to take back his vote against legislation to end good-behavior credits for certain felons in county jails. "I pressed the wrong button on that," he said. Obama was the lone dissenter on Feb. 24, 2000, against 57 yeas for a ban on human cloning. "I pressed the wrong button by accident," he said. But two of Obama's bumbles came on more-sensitive topics, he backed legislation to permit riverboat casinos to operate even when the boats were dockside. The measure, pushed by the gambling industry and fought by church groups whose support Obama was seeking, passed with two "yeas" to spare -- including Obama's. Moments after its passage he rose to say, explaining that he had mistakenly voted for it.

Obama would later develop a reputation as a critic of the gambling industry, and he voted against a similar measure two years later. But he was clearly confused about how to handle the issue at the time of his first vote, telling a church group that he was "undecided" about whether he backed an expansion of riverboat gambling. And, months earlier, he had voted in favor of a version of the bill.

by OBAMA LIES AGAIN on April 16th 2008 5:41 PM

Obama's named in Rezko trial

FEDERAL COURT | Senator Obama attended bash for Iraqi crook Nadhmi Auchi
April 15, 2008

BY NATASHA KORECKI, CHRIS FUSCO AND TIM NOVAK Staff Reporters
Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama was again drawn into Tony Rezko's corruption trial on Monday, when the prosecution's star witness placed Obama at a party for an Iraqi-born billionaire who was later barred entry to the United States.
Stuart Levine testified under cross-examination that Obama and his wife, Michelle, attended the April 3, 2004, reception for Nadhmi Auchi.

The government's star witness testified Monday that Sen. Barack Obama (left) attended a party four years ago at the home of Antoin ''Tony'' Rezko (top right) that was held to honor Iraqi-born Nadhmi Auchi


RELATED STORIES
Rezko's billionaire buddy 'CI4' -- the mystery figure who helped jail Rezko Gov's fundraiser got loan from Iraqi billionaire Obama's answers about Auchi from a March 14 Sun-Times interview Eye on Rezko Updates from our blog

An Obama connection?
News reports and now court testimony have linked presidential hopeful Barack Obama with Iraqi-born billionaire Nadhmi Auchi through Tony Rezko. Here's a rundown:
March 11, 2004 -- Obama met Middle Eastern bankers at the Four Seasons hotel in Chicago at a reception hosted by Rezko, who was courting potential investors for a 62-acre South Loop development. Auchi later took control of that project but did not attend, sources say.
April 1, 2004 -- Auchi flew in to Midway Airport on a private plane and attended a Four Seasons reception hosted by Gov. Blagojevich. Rezko planned the event and was there. Obama was not.
April 3, 2004 -- Auchi attended a dinner party at Rezko's Wilmette mansion. Obama and his wife, Michelle, also were there, according to testimony Monday at Rezko's corruption trial. The Obama campaign's response: "Senator and Mrs. Obama have no recollection of attending any such event."
Oct. 11, 2006 -- Charges against Rezko announced.
Jan. 28, 2008 -- Rezko was jailed for withholding details of his finances -- including a $3.5 million payment from an Auchi company in April 2007.
Auchi -- who lives in London -- had been convicted of fraud in France in 2003. After visiting Chicago and Detroit in 2004, he wasn't allowed back into this country in 2005, according to a prosecution filing in the Rezko case.
The April 3, 2004, gathering for Auchi took place at Rezko's mansion in Wilmette, with about 100 people attending, Levine testified.
"Mr. and Mrs. Obama were there, were they not?" Rezko's lawyer, Joseph Duffy, asked.
"Yes, sir," Levine said.
Later Monday, Obama campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt said: "As he has said previously, Senator Obama does not recall meeting Nadhmi Auchi at any time or on any occasion, and this includes any event that may have been held for Mr. Auchi. Senator and Mrs. Obama have no recollection of attending any such event."
But according to two sources familiar with the gathering, the Obamas attended the Wilmette reception, which came less than a month after Obama's Democratic primary win for his U.S. Senate seat. Rezko had been a key fund-raiser for Obama, who has since given to charity nearly $160,000 in Rezko-linked contributions.
Levine testified he was invited to the reception after meeting with Rezko and his family days earlier, during a spring vacation in Puerto Vallarta.
Auchi couldn't be reached Monday. His lawyer, Alasdair Pepper, told the Sun-Times in February his client "has no recollection of meeting Senator Obama." Auchi is appealing his French conviction. His 15-month sentence is suspended as long as he commits no new crimes. He is not accused of wrongdoing involving Rezko.
Obama is not accused of any wrongdoing. But his relationship with Rezko -- who is accused of demanding kickbacks from people seeking Illinois government business -- is under a microscope as he seeks the presidency. Obama particularly has drawn fire for buying property from Rezko's wife -- a strip of land adjacent to Obama's Kenwood home -- at a time Rezko was already known to be under federal investigation.
Levine testified Rezko had to leave Mexico early to host Auchi. So Levine chartered a private jet to fly Rezko's wife and children -- as well as his own family -- back to Chicago on April 3, 2004.
That night, Levine testified, he attended the reception, which was arranged to interest Auchi in investing in Illinois.
Gov. Blagojevich hosted a separate dinner party for Auchi two days earlier, at the Four Seasons hotel in downtown Chicago, the Sun-Times has reported.
Auchi was named by prosecutors in the January court filing that led to Rezko's bail being revoked and his being jailed. Last April, an Auchi company wired Rezko $3.5 million in connection with a valuable 62-acre South Loop site, which Rezko didn't disclose to authorities. Auchi's General Mediterranean Holding now controls the land at Roosevelt and Clark.
Prosecutors said Rezko appealed to the State Department in November 2005 to allow Auchi to enter the United States, after Auchi was unable to do so.

by Obama Iraqi crook Nadhmi Auchi on April 16th 2008 5:43 PM

I liked this article. Good insight. It's also amusing that the Clintons simply pretend that they decide what matters. Poor Clintons, can't help but feel sorry for them.
by CC on April 17th 2008 8:54 AM

Come on readers, use your heads. Obama does not take money from lobbyist. You can take money from individuals whether they are CEO's or oil companies or not, Jackass. Stop trying to make a story out of nothing. Better to be perceived an idiot, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
by Use your judgement on April 17th 2008 9:26 AM

Well done. A great look from the inside. I thoroughly enjoyed reading it.
by Wally Lemis on April 17th 2008 3:13 PM

Wow, there's a lot of dirt on Obama in these comments. Too bad it's all bullcrap. That's one of the big problems with Obama - he's clean. THEY'VE GOT NOTHIN'.
by jpowalski on April 17th 2008 8:03 PM

Yes, there is close to 1.5 mil CEO on Obama donor's list. One of them is me.
by ColinS on April 17th 2008 8:04 PM

This is what a lie looks like:
~~~
One can easily misspeak or have a lapse in memory. But I think If I were running across a tarmac with my head down, trying to dodge bullets I would remember that. This is not a misspeak or an exaggeration. It's a shameless lie, clearly and simply. Hillary Clinton is a liar.


Barack Obama a fine man and will make a great leader, if people are not so swallowed up in hate and ignorance that they cannot hear his wonderful message of hope.
Being bi-racial, Barack Obama is in the position to see things from more than one side. He is not perfect. He is a human being, albeit a quality human being and he will make a wonderful President, and will bring change to the world. It would be a tragedy if we lost out on that. Please remember that Barack's mother was white, and he has said on more than one occasion that the best that is in him, he owes to her.
I wish you a fair wind at your back, Mr. Obama.
by Joan on April 18th 2008 12:36 PM

http://www.law.uchicago.edu/media/index.html

The Law School has received many media requests about Barack Obama, especially about his status as "Senior Lecturer."

From 1992 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Barack Obama served as a professor in the Law School. He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996. He was a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004, during which time he taught three courses per year. Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status. Like Obama, each of the Law School's Senior Lecturers has high-demand careers in politics or public service, which prevent full-time teaching. Several times during his 12 years as a professor in the Law School, Obama was invited to join the faculty in a full-time tenure-track position, but he declined.
by James on April 18th 2008 2:39 PM

I love that the first comments here are deranged, conspiracy-theory laden black-helicopter rantings from crazed Clintonites (or possibly Republicans - it's getting so hard to tell these days).
by Chris on April 18th 2008 3:29 PM

I wish I were surprised that some Clinton supporters would stoop to saying that Obama supporters "can't think for themselves." That's insulting, and unnecessary, and unhelpful. On policy, there are few differences between the two candidates. I support Obama because he opposed the war from the beginning, and because I want a president who does not accept PAC money or employ lobbyists. That being said, I will happily vote for Hillary in November if she is the nominee. We can't afford John McCain.
by Aimee on April 18th 2008 3:58 PM

Go Obama '08
by Kyle on April 18th 2008 4:11 PM

thanks. I enjoyed this. both articles are interesting.
by sandy on April 18th 2008 4:35 PM

It's Cesar Chavez, not "Caesar". Great piece, though.
by Lyle on April 18th 2008 5:14 PM

It's not a coincidence that David Axlerod also ran Deval Patrick's campaign. He's very good at inflating good talkers into mythic figures. Too bad he can't teach them to be effective once they're in, as that one volunteer learned.
by Bethany on April 18th 2008 6:45 PM

FLOC, or the Farm Labor Organizing Committee, was not Cesar Chavez's union. that was the UFW, United Farm Workers. FLOC is an AFL-CIO affiliated union of farm laborers mainly in the Midwest and Southeast. Please try checking your facts next time.
by a on April 18th 2008 7:13 PM

The best part is the fact that the Clinton backers talk about not being able to think for themselves while milling about, waiting for programming ("instructions" would give them too much credit) from the Clintons. There hasn't been such a low level of individual thought since early in the first world war, when troops were made to WALK side-by-side between the trenches while being mowed down (just ask McCain).
Quite honestly, the best testament to just how much better Obama's organization and supporters are, Obama's lead continued to increase while he was on VACATION in Jamaica. He doesn't even need to do anything to beat Clinton.
by anon. on April 18th 2008 11:54 PM

Interesting article! Bottom line still remains, who will make the best Democratic Nominee for President?

Senator Barack Obama has been right on more issues than the other Presidential candidates.

Senator Obama was the only candidate who had the judgment necessary to take a stand against our misguided war in Iraq from the start.

Obama is the candidate has most consistently called for America to end the wild goose chase in Iraq and redirect its might to the unfinished business of finally tracking down the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11.

Obama has been the strongest candidate on cleaning up Washington. He spearheaded major ethics reform laws in Congress. He is the only candidate to reject money from registered lobbyists. He is the only candidate to pass laws showing where all our government money spent on contractors is going.

Senator Obama is the only candidate who had the foresight not to vote for Bush’s warmongering resolution last Fall declaring Iran’s military to be terrorists. Only weeks later we learned that at the same time the President was painting the imminent picture of a nuclear-armed Iran, a secret top-level National Intelligence Estimate report had found that Iran stopped its nuclear weapons development in 2003 and probably hasn’t restarted it since then. The other candidates as recently as last Fall fell into the trap of nearly going down the path towards another unnecessary war we cannot afford.

Obama is the candidate who is inspiring people with a clear and consistent message of unity and hope for change. He is the only candidate who understands that the usual grind it out, Washington attack politics has not worked and will not work to bring real and lasting change to America. Without a unity of purpose and hope, no change can stick. Future politicians will tear down any change that does not have broad and unified support.

Of all the Presidential candidates, Obama has shown the most promise in being able to deliver. He has proven he has the ability to execute on his message. He managed and organized his campaign better than the other candidates. He went from being the long-shot to taking the lead in delegates, the popular vote and states won. Senator Obama has tried to stay on the high road and has been the most honest with Americans in his campaign. He has done something big right, in a big way.

Senator Obama is not perfect, but he is our best hope. Please vote to enable us, the People, to take the next steps to changing America for the better with President Obama leading the way.

by Duck Soup on April 19th 2008 12:50 PM

Funny- If the Clinton campaign is so messed up how is he only able to manage a virtual tie? Hillary Clinton has been out manned, out gunned, and out spent 2 and 3 to 1. Yet Obama has only been able to manage a very tenuous, and questionable tie. The Clinton campaign is REAL grassroots. Not Corp. sponsored grass roots fake American Idol bs!

Just wait....
by chad on April 19th 2008 3:19 PM

I thought this report was interesting.

"Hillary Clinton has been out manned, out gunned, and out spent 2 and 3 to 1. Yet Obama has only been able to manage a very tenuous, and questionable tie."

The answer is that PA's governor is a top notch politician. Secondly, Obama was right. People in PA ignore what intellectually is in their own best interest and vote from their "gut" That makes them vulnerable to Gov Rendell. If Rendell were for Obama, Clinton would not win. If Rendell were for Obama his political payoff for Obama winning would not be as great. This is politics.
by Ronnn on April 19th 2008 3:55 PM

Although I thought these articles were very interesting, I'd like to point out that just because a lot of Obama supporters are young it doesn't mean we're brainwashed. The people my age who bothered to go to the caucus are the ones who care about the state of the country, not the ones who thought it would be the "cool" thing to do.
by Dani on April 19th 2008 4:23 PM

People...People...Hillary Clinton started her campaign along with Bill Clinton years ago when he wanted to be president....this woman has been campaigning for OVER 20 years.....Hillary Clinton has been collecting favors all along the way....during this campaign of hers.....Hillary Clinton is not out manned or out gunned......she is calling in favors....too bad that it is at the experience of good people that need help now.....

I guess Gov. Rendell has done great things for PA....so all Hillary has to do is get paid in the form of VOTES.....It seems to me that if PA meant so much to Hillary....she would have found ways to funnel money and support into the state to help the many people in need A LONG TIME AGO......BUT, OF COURSE SHE DID NOT....

Hillary Clinton will run this country the same way that is has run her campaign....if she steals the presidency....WE ALL HAD BETTER BE SCARED.......
by Eloise on April 19th 2008 6:43 PM

The young people that support Barack Obama are smart and hard working people that will run and lead this country in the near future....I respect for standing up for what they believe in....because they are not supporting Hillary...does not mean they are brainwashed...

I am 56 years old.... and I support Obama because I know the old games...and it time to stop this NONSENSE... and help people and this country to get going to accomplish great things....

OUT WITH THE OLD....AND IN WITH THE NEW....

Barack Obama ‘08
by Eloise on April 19th 2008 6:52 PM

The young people that support Barack Obama are smart and hard working people that will run and lead this country in the near future....I respect them for standing up for what they believe in....because they are not supporting Hillary...does not mean they are brainwashed...

I am 56 years old.... and I support Obama because I know the old games...and it time to stop this NONSENSE... and help people and this country to get going to accomplish great things....

OUT WITH THE OLD....AND IN WITH THE NEW....

Barack Obama ‘08
by Eloise on April 19th 2008 6:54 PM

Ronn...What is OPRAH then????
by Chad on April 19th 2008 7:26 PM

good news Clinton People. We are up. Check it out
Dont buy the media hype on this guy!
http://www.gallup.com/poll/106606/Gallup-Daily-Clinton-46-Obama-45.aspx
by Don on April 19th 2008 8:01 PM

Obama will lose to Hillary in Pa and nationally. So all you young "smart" people enjoy it now. Obama has no experience nationally(Jr senator) and did nothing as a state legislator. Check it out instead of jumping on his band wagon. If your smart don't listen to the 30 second comercials do some research. Go Hillary 08!
by John on April 19th 2008 10:48 PM

Go Hillary 08! Go back to New York and represent your constituents and stop wasting time and money on a losing campaign.

Yes, we can! Obama 08!
by Ron on April 20th 2008 12:32 AM

Political Pretzels?

Did you ever wonder why people like chocolate covered pretzels? I know why I do, because they offer the juxtaposition of sweetness against the bitterness of salt. Politics are something like pretzels.

Hillary’s lie (“I mispoke”) about arriving under fire in Bosnia, with her daughter no less, is so far afield as to make anyone bitter with her. Now, at the Philly debate, she tried to camouflage it under another lie, that it was because she was tired when she said it. She claims she’s “...not dumb” but anyone who’d try to pull a stunt like that, with all the media coverage it got, isn’t showing good sense. We would really need to worry if she answered the red phone in the middle of the night.

Obama has more true experience in foreign affairs than does Hillary. He is of another culture and has lived in other cultures thus gaining a far better insight than a first lady who supposedly gained her “experience” at pomp, ceremony and fancy dinners.

Do you remember Travelgate? Hillary tried to get a 30-year upright White House Transportation Department officer to do her bidding. Because it was shady he refused to bend his morals and she fired him. Remember when the Clinton’s left office for their private residence and knowingly took silver, presidential dishes, valuable paintings, some furniture etc. with them from the White House? It was in all the newspapers. Reluctantly they gave some of it back under pressure. And what about renting out the Lincoln bedroom? All that and more cause a very bitter taste in my mouth, what about yours?.

No way do I want the salty and smart alex Clinton’s back to defile our precious White House further. “It all depends upon what your interpretation of ‘is’ is.” Why would any woman vote for Hillary simply to put a woman in as President? That’s like putting aside good sense rather than thinking of improving the morals of our country.

I am a 70 year old white woman who is looking at the less tainted, thoughtful, “together,” chocolate-hued man to turn our country around. I’d like to be able to cast a presidential vote for the Lincolnish Obama. Besides his six or eight years in the two Senates and his time as a lawyer, he has given of himself on the streets of Chicago. He wants to help turn around errant youth, white as well as black and to help make college more affordable for everyone. All that, and his many more plans sound like a sweet alternative to me.

by Louise on April 20th 2008 12:37 AM

It's so frustrating to read the words of the paid Obama bloggers (yes, we know who you are, and that you are being paid to blog).

Obama is backed by more PACs than any other party regardless of party. MoveOn PAC alone gave him $12 million. Then, he flies to San Francisco to raise a million dollars a night from the San Francisco socialites - the Gettys. It was a Getty event that he laughed at the people of Pennsylvania.

At some point, people will see Obama for the faker that he is.
by Debbie from Haverford on April 20th 2008 8:13 PM

(Wish I could get in on that racket! Wonder if they get paid by the word or the hour.)

Debbie, do you have any independent sources to back up your assertions? A helpful blogger would.
by Jon on April 21st 2008 6:48 AM

Great article - being an undecided independent - I WAS leaning towards Obama - however after the debate and much much research that I hope Philly has done at least a little - I have found that the Bosnia lie is nothing compared to http://www.obamaunveiled.com - lets look at 74 and counting - I want someone in the oval office that I do not have to worry about the "wrong" people showing up at the "wrong" time.
by Wizard101 on April 21st 2008 5:05 PM

Old Republican tactic, buy the election, seems to be what Obama's supporters are doing, makes you wonder if it is not really Republicans wanting Obama to be the candidate.
by John Doty on April 21st 2008 7:33 PM

Certainly from "day one" Hillary, of all people, understood the need for sufficient and prudent use of money to run a presidential campaign.

PA voters, you can affirm Barack as our party's nominee and declare an end to this mess and in so doing, you will also allow the Clinton's to save some degree of dignity as the former First Family.

They have fought a good fight and it has run its course. You must now tell them what they refuse to accept otherwise.
by Reggie Boykins on April 22nd 2008 2:06 AM

I have a few questions for Senator Clinton's supporters.

1) Her campaign run by the supposedly "astute" Clintonites has been a great mess. How will she manage a nation if she cannot manage a campaign?

2)How come ALL the female Democratic senators do not support her?

3)How come the people who have known her best (Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, Bob Kerry, Bill Richardson, Robert Reich etc etc)support Senator Obama?

4)She did zilch for her Grand Parents town where she spent time growing up. A place described as one of the poorest in America when First Lady or a Senator albeit for New York.
What makes anyone think she cares about PA or you poor NAFTA and other trade deals victims?

Just a deranged and brain washed Obamabot who seem to look at things a bit deeper than the woopy do da smart Clintonites. Hillary with her antics has set back the cause of women advancement in politics by a generation. Shame that!

Some links to help you get more informed about the candidates.

Endorsement from Michael Moore and reference to Rev Wright helping the Clintons
http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php?id=225

Rendell Praises Farrakhan
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=DXum_-8I1TA

Real Time Real Reporter Jeremy Scahill finds support amongst gun totting bikers for Obama in Pa.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uO_KITFHmY

Americans abroad supporting Obama

http://www.americans-away-from-home.com

The tide is turning
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9ubMQX7WE&eurl=http://agonist.org/schecter/?p=8152

by Ricardo on April 22nd 2008 1:26 PM

fuck obama
by denise on April 26th 2008 12:34 AM

To the poster above - the pettiness of the Clintonistas astounds me. The expression "Fuck (you fill in the blank)" should only be reserved for one person...Bush. Simply amazing. Obama will be the nominee. Deal with it.
by daisychain on April 26th 2008 1:49 PM

Hello--please check your spelling in the following sentence: "This was the same week Hillary Clinton took criticism for her "Tulza tale,"

Tulsa in in Oklahoma and Tulza doesn't even exist. Were you perhaps trying to say Tuzla? That does exist.

by Foodforthought on May 25th 2008 12:56 PM


All reader comments are subject to our Terms of Use. By clicking Post Comment, you acknowledge that you have reviewed and agree to these Terms.

Name
please enter your name
Email (will not be published)
please enter a valid email
Comment
please enter a comment
Enter the security code on the right in the textbox below.
Security Code
please enter the code
Join the City Paper Mailing List
 

Also In This Week's Cover Story Section

The Election Issue
I Was an Obama Volunteer
by Mike Newall

Obama For President
by The City Paper Staff

Recent Comments
Web Exclusives
Great Migration
THEATER REVIEW: Coming Home
Sëla
"Pedal to the Side"
BYOTY Book Fair
Sat., Oct. 17, noon-6 p.m., free, Little Berlin, 119 W. Montgomery St., 610-308-0579, littleberlin.org.
Advertisements
 


search restaurants by name
search by neighborhood
Search
search by cuisine
title
theater

Search
search for:
within:   of  
more jobs
(use zip or city, state)
Search
"Great vision without great people is irrelevant."
—Jim Collins, Author,
"Good to Great"
In Partnership with JobCircle
start date / /  select date
end date / /  select date
category
keyword
Search Buy Concert Tickets
Category:
Keywords: Search

Search Real Estate

ALL | MON | TUE | WED | THU | FRI | SAT | SUN

or

LOCATION:

ADVERTISEMENT